Archive for the ‘history’ tag
stupid united states laws
Why the RIAA (or others) so upset about illegal music downloads on music videos …
are loaded by artists or their record label. Would not this then be like saying "Ok, so let's put it on YouTube, which is free, but you can not have any music free" … Not receive money from YouTube (from what I know), then not come to some kind of law on fair use? Just do not understand how they are so stupid sometimes! Btw, I live in the United States to follow its laws … I have not downloaded anything illegal, I ask for those who do. Ja, I suppose if you can not be on the Internet While you can not listen to free music on demand … but if you have Internet, then free music on demand for you! (according to the RIAA)
Well, my problem with them is the fact that, once you download and pay for something that is not mine yet. I do not want to see me online file sharing and such, but still want to limit what devices can I say mine and how many times can I transfer. Hah. If it's mine and I paid for me to be able to use it as I give please. It's like this, going after grandmothers 78 years for her grandson file sharing Grammy OND computer "and now actually arguing that the stations air radio playing his music is illegal to use and the RIAA should get paid for it only illustrates how ……. clueless and desperate they really are.
Stupid US Laws
|
|
From it’s the process, stupid. (2000).(Brief Article): An article from: Columbia Journalism Review $5.95 This digital document is an article from Columbia Journalism Review, published by Columbia University, Graduate School of Journalism on November 1, 2001. The length of the article is 446 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with a… |